Dockge

Self-hosted Docker management, honestly reviewed. Written for founders who want to run their own stack without a DevOps team.

TL;DR

• What it is: A self-hosted Docker Compose stack manager — a visual UI for your compose.yaml files that stores everything as plain files on your disk, not inside a proprietary database [README][6].
• Who it’s for: Solo developers, homelab runners, and non-technical founders who are already using Docker Compose and want a clean web interface to manage their stacks without wrestling with Portainer’s business-tier upsells [1][6].
• Cost savings: Data not available on direct SaaS equivalents, since Dockge has no cloud version. The comparison is against managed container platforms (Railway, Render, Fly.io) that charge $5–$20+/month per service, versus self-hosting your entire stack on a $6–10/mo VPS with Dockge as the control plane.
• Key strength: Genuinely the simplest Docker Compose UI that exists. Logs, YAML editor, and terminal all on one page. No tabs, no navigation maze [6]. Real-time output for pulls and container operations [README][6].
• Key weakness: It’s a compose manager, not a full container platform. No visual volume/network inspector, no update notifications, no Docker secrets support, no built-in reverse proxy. It handles compose stacks well and leaves everything else to you [1][4].

---

What is Dockge

Dockge is a web UI for managing Docker Compose stacks. You point it at a directory on your server (/opt/stacks by default), and it gives you a browser interface to create, edit, start, stop, restart, and delete compose-based services. Each stack is a folder containing a compose.yaml — the same file you’d write by hand, stored exactly where you’d expect it on disk [README].

The project is built by Louis Lam, who also created Uptime Kuma — a self-hosted uptime monitor with 62K+ GitHub stars and a cult following for its clean UI. Dockge has the same design sensibility. It sits at 22,496 stars on GitHub as of this review [merged profile]. The MIT license means no usage restrictions, no “community vs. enterprise” licensing games, and no vendor lock-in [merged profile].

The pitch on the GitHub README is honest: “A fancy, easy-to-use and reactive self-hosted docker compose.yaml stack-oriented manager.” The word “reactive” is doing real work here — progress from image pulls, container start sequences, and log output all stream in real time without a page refresh [README][6].

What makes Dockge distinct is its explicit rejection of the Portainer model. Portainer stores stack configuration in its own database. Dockge does not. Your compose.yaml files live as regular files on your drive, readable and editable with any text editor, manageable with standard docker compose commands even if Dockge disappears tomorrow [README][1][6]. The noted.lol reviewer, a five-year Portainer user, switched specifically because of this: “I’m pleased to have moved away from the ‘Upgrade to Portainer Business’ nags” [6].

Version 1.4.0 added multiple agents support — you can manage stacks across different Docker hosts from a single Dockge interface [README]. A SynoForum user confirmed this works across a Synology NAS and a separate Debian server simultaneously [5].

---

Why people choose it over Portainer

The reviews converge around one comparison: Dockge vs Portainer. There’s no meaningful Dockge vs Kubernetes or Dockge vs Nomad conversation — this tool is firmly in the “I have a VPS and I want a UI” category.

The Portainer fatigue angle. The noted.lol reviewer had used Portainer for five years and found it increasingly built for businesses rather than hobbyists and indie founders [6]. The SynoForum contributor switched after a Portainer snafu triggered by a Docker update: “After a recent Portainer snafu with my Debian server, triggered by a docker-ce update, I ran across Dockge. While it lacks some exotic bits and pieces of Portainer, it is a super easy way of managing docker containers” [5].

The file-based argument. Aaron Godfrey’s homelab review [1] highlights the compose-first approach as a practical win: when he sets up multi-service stacks like Paperless-ngx (which requires a web server, PostgreSQL, Gotenberg, and Apache Tika), defining everything in a single compose.yaml is simpler than installing four separate Unraid apps and managing their dependencies independently. Dockge makes that file the source of truth.

The “two apps for two jobs” reality. The XDA Developers review [4] is the most balanced take. The author uses Dockge alongside Portainer, not instead of it. Portainer handles single containers with fine-grained volume controls, network inspection, and health checks. Dockge handles compose stacks where editing the YAML after deployment matters — something Portainer doesn’t support once a stack is running. That’s the honest division: Dockge wins on compose-file editability, Portainer wins on container-level introspection [4].

The Uptime Kuma halo effect. Several reviews note that people tried Dockge specifically because they already trusted Louis Lam’s previous work. The Reddit r/selfhosted post [2] frames it as “Dockge looks to be an interesting alternative to Portainer… developed by the Uptime Kuma dev and it has a similar interface.” For a community that cares about who’s maintaining their self-hosted tools, authorship matters.

---

Features

Based on the README and first-hand reviews:

Core compose management:

• Create, edit, start, stop, restart, delete stacks via browser UI [README]
• Interactive compose.yaml editor — edit YAML in the browser, apply changes without touching the CLI [README][6]
• Real-time log streaming — container output appears live in the UI [README][6]
• Interactive web terminal — exec into a running container directly from the interface without SSH [README][6]
• Update Docker images from the UI [README]
• Convert docker run commands to compose.yaml — paste a docker run ... string, get back a compose file [README][1][6]
• File-based structure — stacks stored as regular files on disk, accessible via normal docker compose commands independent of Dockge [README][1][6]

Multi-host management (v1.4.0+):

• Multiple agents support — manage stacks on different Docker hosts from a single Dockge interface [README][5]
• The SynoForum user confirmed this works across a Synology NAS and a Debian server: “from my Synology Dockge UI, I can also bring up the packages running on my Debian server” [5]

Environment and configuration:

• Per-stack .env file editing via the UI — set environment variables without touching the CLI [1]
• Compose file changes are applied and tracked per stack

What it doesn’t do:

• No visual volume inspector or volume removal [4]
• No network map or network troubleshooting [4]
• No Docker secrets support — environment variables are plain-text on disk [1]
• No update notifications — you can trigger an update but there’s no “updates available” indicator [1]
• No built-in reverse proxy or SSL termination (you handle that separately with Caddy, Traefik, or nginx) [1]
• No single-container management with the granular controls Portainer offers [4]

---

Pricing: SaaS vs self-hosted math

Dockge itself: $0, MIT license, runs on your server [merged profile][README].

The more useful cost comparison isn’t Dockge vs a competitor — it’s running your own stack managed by Dockge vs paying for a managed container platform. The profile lists Heroku as the reference SaaS, which is reasonable framing: Heroku and its modern equivalents (Railway, Render, Fly.io) are where non-technical founders often start because they require no server management.

Managed platform pricing (for reference):

• Heroku: Free tier eliminated in 2022. Containers (Dynos) now start at $5–$25/month per dyno. A simple three-service app (web, worker, database) runs $15–$75/month before you add managed data services [merged profile].
• Railway: $5/month hobby plan, usage-based beyond that. Gets expensive fast with multiple services.
• Render: Free for static sites, $7/month per web service for managed deployments.
• Fly.io: Generous free tier, but multi-region deployments add up; $1.94/month per shared-CPU VM.

Self-hosted stack with Dockge:

• VPS to run everything: $5–10/month on Hetzner, Contabo, or DigitalOcean
• Dockge: $0
• Your stacks: running as many containers as your VPS can handle

Concrete example: A small SaaS running a Node.js app, PostgreSQL, Redis, and a background worker. On Railway that’s four separate services potentially costing $30–50/month on a usage-based plan. On a Hetzner CX22 (3 vCPU, 4GB RAM, $6.49/month) with Dockge managing your compose stacks, it’s $6.49/month and you own the infrastructure.

Over a year: Railway/Render at $40/month average = $480. Hetzner VPS = $78. That’s roughly $400/year saved — and the savings scale as you add more services, since a managed platform charges per service while your VPS just uses more RAM.

Caveat: the managed platform price includes someone else handling server security, updates, and uptime. If you’re not monitoring your VPS or running automated backups, the math gets complicated fast.

---

Deployment reality check

Dockge has the shortest install path of any serious Docker management tool. Four commands from the README:

mkdir -p /opt/stacks /opt/dockge
cd /opt/dockge
curl https://raw.githubusercontent.com/louislam/dockge/master/compose.yaml --output compose.yaml
docker compose up -d

That’s it. Dockge runs on port 5001. For Synology NAS users, the SynoForum guide shows how to remap the port and point it at a custom stacks directory [5]. The website also offers an interactive compose.yaml generator if you want to customize the stacks path or port before running anything [README].

What you actually need:

• Linux VPS or NAS with Docker 20+ installed (or Podman with podman-docker)
• Supported architectures: amd64, arm64, armv7 — covers most VPS providers and ARM-based NAS devices [README]
• A reverse proxy (Caddy, nginx) if you want HTTPS — Dockge doesn’t handle SSL itself
• About 256MB RAM for Dockge itself; your stacks will need whatever their own images require

What can go sideways:

• The UI “can get a little squished and hard to read with bigger compose files or just when trying to read the logs,” per Aaron Godfrey’s review [1]. This is a real limitation for anyone running compose files with 10+ services.
• No built-in update detection. You have to manually pull updated images — there’s no dashboard badge that says “3 services have newer versions available.” Tools like cup or Watchtower fill this gap externally [1].
• Docker secrets are not supported. Sensitive values like API keys go in .env files that are plain-text on disk [1]. This is acceptable for a homelab or small-team VPS, less acceptable if your server is accessible to multiple untrusted users or if you have compliance requirements.
• The XDA reviewer [4] found Portainer necessary alongside Dockge for volume management tasks. If you need to detach, inspect, or prune volumes visually, you’ll either use the CLI or run Portainer next to Dockge.
• Windows is explicitly not supported (README marks it ❌) — Linux and macOS only [README].

Realistic time estimate for a developer: under 15 minutes to a working Dockge instance. For a non-technical founder with a Linux VPS: 1–2 hours including setting up the VPS, Docker, Dockge, and a reverse proxy with HTTPS. First-time Linux server users should budget a full afternoon.

---

Pros and cons

Pros

• Genuinely simple UI. Every reviewer who switched from Portainer notes this immediately. Logs, YAML editor, and terminal are all on one page per stack — no navigating between tabs [6][1]. The noted.lol reviewer calls it “a seamless Docker management experience” specifically because of this consolidation [6].
• File-based compose storage. Dockge doesn’t kidnap your files. Your compose.yaml lives on disk, editable with vim, backed up with rsync, readable without Dockge running. No proprietary database format to worry about [README][1][6].
• MIT license, no tier games. The full product is free. No “Business Edition” watermarks, no feature gates, no per-node pricing. Everything in the GitHub README is everything you get [README][merged profile].
• Real-time streaming. Progress during image pulls and container operations streams live — no refresh needed, no guessing whether it’s hanging [README][6].
• docker run converter. Small feature, disproportionately useful. Copy a docker run command from any GitHub README, paste it into Dockge, get back a compose file [README][1][6].
• Multi-host agent support. Manage stacks on multiple Docker hosts from one interface — added in v1.4.0 and confirmed working across Synology NAS + Debian server by at least one user [README][5].
• Tiny footprint. Dockge runs on roughly 256MB RAM. Doesn’t compete with your actual stacks for resources [README].
• From a trusted author. Louis Lam’s track record with Uptime Kuma gives Dockge credibility that a new project from an unknown author wouldn’t have [2][6].

Cons

• No visual volume or network management. The XDA reviewer [4] explicitly calls this out — you can’t inspect, prune, or create volumes from Dockge’s UI, and there’s no network map. You need either Portainer or the CLI for that work.
• No update notifications. Dockge can update a container when you ask it to, but it won’t tell you one needs updating. You need an external tool like Watchtower or cup [1].
• No Docker secrets. Sensitive config goes in .env files, plain-text on disk. Acceptable for many setups, a dealbreaker for others [1].
• UI gets cramped with large compose files. Noted by Aaron Godfrey — the editor and log view feel “squished” when your compose file is long or your log output is dense [1].
• Not a full container platform. Single-container management with granular controls (health checks, one-click duplication, network attachment) is weaker than Portainer [4]. If you need those capabilities regularly, you’ll run Portainer alongside it.
• No SSL, no reverse proxy built in. You handle that yourself. Fine for experienced users, another setup step for beginners.
• Windows not supported. Stated limitation in the README [README].
• Smaller community than Portainer. 22K stars is healthy, but Portainer has had years to accumulate documentation, tutorials, and StackOverflow answers. You’ll find fewer pre-written guides for Dockge-specific problems.

---

Who should use this / who shouldn’t

Use Dockge if:

• You’re already writing docker compose files and you want a web UI that treats those files as the source of truth, not as inputs to a proprietary system.
• You run a homelab or a small production VPS with a handful of services and you want simple stack management without Portainer’s business-tier friction.
• You’re a non-technical founder who has (or hired) someone to set up your VPS and Docker, and you want a clean UI to start/stop/update your services without touching the command line.
• You manage Docker on multiple hosts (a home server plus a cloud VPS) and want to see them in one interface via the multi-agent feature.
• You just want the docker run → compose.yaml converter alone, which is worth something.

Skip it (use Portainer instead) if:

• You need visual volume management, network inspection, or container health checks with GUI controls.
• You’re managing a larger infrastructure where Portainer’s RBAC, audit logs, or edge agent features matter.
• You need something with broader community documentation and enterprise support options.

Skip it (use Coolify or Dokploy instead) if:

• You want a more complete self-hosted PaaS experience — automated Git deployments, built-in SSL, domain management, and a database UI. Coolify and Dokploy cover this territory; Dockge explicitly doesn’t.

Skip it entirely if:

• You’ve never used Docker and don’t want to learn. Dockge assumes you know what a compose file is. If you’re starting from zero, a managed platform (Railway, Render) will get you running faster.
• You need Docker secrets, secrets management, or multi-user access controls. Dockge doesn’t cover this ground.

---

Alternatives worth considering

• Portainer Community Edition — the obvious incumbent. More features, more complexity, free community tier with commercial tiers that include RBAC, audit logs, and support. Better for teams and larger infrastructure. The compose-file editing limitation (can’t edit after deploy) is what sends people to Dockge [4][6].
• Yacht — another minimal Docker web UI. Less active development than Dockge; similar simplicity target.
• Lazydocker — terminal-based, not browser-based. If you’re comfortable in the CLI, this gives you similar visibility without needing a web server.
• Coolify — significantly more ambitious. Handles Git-connected deployments, built-in SSL via Caddy, database provisioning, and a full PaaS UI. Much higher complexity ceiling. If “self-hosted Heroku” is what you want, Coolify is the closer answer; if you just want to manage existing compose stacks, Coolify is overkill.
• Dokploy — similar to Coolify, newer. Git deployments, multiple server management, SSL, monitoring. More overlap with Coolify than with Dockge.
• Managed platforms (Railway, Render, Fly.io) — not self-hosted, but the relevant alternative for non-technical founders who can’t or won’t maintain a Linux server. Higher monthly cost, zero server management.

For the target audience — someone already running Docker Compose on a VPS who wants a UI rather than raw CLI — the practical shortlist is Dockge vs Portainer Community Edition. Pick Dockge if compose-file editability and simplicity matter more than feature coverage. Pick Portainer if you need volume management, network tools, or you’re running containers for a team.

---

Bottom line

Dockge knows what it is and doesn’t try to be something bigger. It’s a compose stack manager with an honest UI, MIT license, and file-based storage that respects the Docker tools you already know. The people who love it are the people who got frustrated with Portainer’s creeping enterprise complexity and just wanted something that would show them logs and let them edit a YAML file without navigating five menus. The people who don’t love it are the people who needed volume inspection, update notifications, or secrets management and found those gaps too large to work around.

At 22,496 GitHub stars from a developer with a proven track record, Dockge is a safe bet for its stated purpose. If you’re a non-technical founder who has someone managing your server, or a solo developer who wants a clean compose UI for a homelab or small production VPS, there’s no reason not to run it — the install takes four commands and the downside risk is minimal. If your needs grow past compose management, you’ll eventually add Portainer, Coolify, or a proper PaaS. Dockge doesn’t pretend otherwise.

If setting up and maintaining that VPS is the blocker, that’s exactly what unsubbed.co’s parent studio upready.dev handles for clients. One-time deployment, you own the infrastructure.

---

Sources

1. Aaron Godfrey — “Self-hosted: Dockge - Automate The Things” — aarongodfrey.dev. https://aarongodfrey.dev/homelab/self-hosted-dockge/
2. r/selfhosted — “Dockge - Portainer Alternative for Docker Management” — reddit.com. https://www.reddit.com/r/selfhosted/comments/192gv68/dockge_portainer_alternative_for_docker_management/
3. Ernie Smith, Tedium — “Self-Hosting Tools: Still Worth Trying In 2026?” — tedium.co. https://tedium.co/2026/03/28/self-hosting-platform-tools-guide/
4. Samir Makwana, XDA Developers — “6 reasons I use two apps to manage Docker containers in my home lab” — xda-developers.com. https://www.xda-developers.com/reasons-use-two-apps-manage-docker-containers/
5. SynoForum — “Dockge - A Container Manager replacement” — synoforum.com. https://www.synoforum.com/resources/dockge-a-container-manager-replacement.207/
6. Noted.lol — “Dockge - A Docker Manager for Self-Hosting Enthusiasts” — noted.lol. https://noted.lol/dockge/

Primary sources:

• GitHub repository and README: https://github.com/louislam/dockge (22,496 stars, MIT license)
• Official website: https://dockge.kuma.pet